OK, let me get this straight:
1. It’s OK for Sarah Palin to support the passage of laws that would force you or me to give birth to a baby we don’t want, even if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest…
And it’s OK for Palin to point to her own Down Syndrome baby as an example of her pro-life credentials.
But if we wonder why she left her premature, special needs baby with caretakers just three days after he was born, we’re sexist.
2. It’s OK for Sarah Palin to oppose teaching biologically-based sex education in the schools. (She must have something against biology in general, since she thinks all high-school biology classes should also teach the ancient Jewish story about Adam and Eve along with evolution, so teenagers can choose for themselves which theory is more scientific.)
But if we ask any questions about her own daughter’s pregnancy, and wonder if it may be a result of her abstinance-only training, we’re sexist.
I can see why McCain picked a woman - he watched Clinton score points every time she yelled ’sexist’ when the votes didn’t go her way. Now McCain has a VP candidate whose idology would allow her to make life-changing choices for every American family, but her own family is ‘private.’
Give me a break.